LexVio triages contract volume before it reaches a lawyer: a 0-100 Legal Health Score, clause-level risk flags and a tracked-change redline ready to send. A two-person team can then decide where its reading time is worth spending, and hold a consistent line across hundreds of agreements.
Sales sends me eighteen NDAs and four master services agreements in a week and wants all of them back by Friday, and there is no version of that week in which I read every clause of every one with equal attention.
Different people on the team have accepted different limitation-of-liability positions over two years, and nobody can tell me what we have actually agreed to across the portfolio.
When diligence or internal audit asks who approved the deviation and on what date, the answer lives in an email thread that three of us were on and one of us has since left.
The business signs first and asks legal afterwards, so my job becomes explaining what we are now bound to rather than shaping what we agree to.
Every contract LexVio reviews receives a 0-100 Legal Health Score together with clause-level risk flags, so a week's intake arrives ranked instead of as an undifferentiated pile. The score tells you where to read closely; whether a flagged clause is acceptable for this counterparty, this deal size and this business unit is a judgement only your team can make.
LexVio produces tracked-change redlines exportable to Word, and its AI drafting and rewriting proposes alternative wording where a clause sits outside the position you want to hold. Because the output is an ordinary Word file with tracked changes, the counterparty and your internal stakeholders see exactly what moved without learning a new tool.
Nexus searches portfolio-wide, benchmarks clauses across the agreements you already hold, and raises drift alerts where comparable contracts have stopped matching each other, while search by clause type and filter by jurisdiction pull every indemnity or governing-law clause in a set. That is how the question 'what do we normally accept on liability' gets answered from the portfolio rather than from recollection.
LexVio supports SAML SSO and SCIM provisioning, so joiners and leavers are handled by your identity provider rather than by a spreadsheet, and an on-prem deployment option exists where contract data cannot leave your own environment. Data is encrypted with AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit, and customer data is not used to train models.
The Intelligence API and webhooks push contract events into the CLM, ticketing or ERP systems your organisation already runs, so legal status travels to the business instead of requiring the business to visit a legal tool. A Chrome browser extension and a WhatsApp bot cover the other direction, for the stakeholder who will ask a question wherever they happen to be.
Contracts arriving from sales, procurement and partnerships land in Vault, and each one is returned with a 0-100 Legal Health Score and clause-level risk flags. The queue is now ordered by where legal attention is most likely to change the outcome.
Vio answers questions against the single document in front of you while Nexus shows how the same clause has been settled across your existing portfolio. The negotiated position goes back as a tracked-change redline in Word, drafted or rewritten with LexVio and approved by a lawyer.
Workflows and the Intelligence API and webhooks push status into the business systems that need it, so the record of what was agreed does not live only in an inbox. Nexus drift alerts continue to flag where new agreements diverge from the positions your team has settled on.
No. LexVio compresses mechanical work: first-pass review, scoring, clause-level flagging, drafting and rewriting, and portfolio-wide search. Deciding whether a risk is commercially acceptable, what must be escalated, and what the company signs remains with the legal professional, and accountability for the contract sits with the company and its officers rather than with any tool.
LexVio does not write your playbook; it makes departures from it visible. Clause-level risk flags identify where the wording in front of you departs from a standard position, and Nexus benchmarks clauses portfolio-wide and raises drift alerts where comparable agreements have stopped matching. The policy itself remains yours to set, for example what pre-estimated damages figure you are willing to name, given that Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 entitles the injured party to reasonable compensation not exceeding the amount named, whether or not actual loss is proved.
Commercial contracts routinely carry personal data, so LexVio encrypts data with AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit, does not train models on customer data, and offers an on-prem deployment option where data must remain inside your own infrastructure. On the Indian statutory position, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 received Presidential assent in August 2023 and is being brought into force alongside its subordinate rules, so confirm the current commencement position and applicable compliance timelines before fixing your programme dates.
Bring a real contract or a live filing deadline. Half-hour walkthrough, no slides.