AI contract review, redlining, Indian court research across SC, HCs, NCLT, ITAT, CCI, and CESTAT, and white-label client reports — built for law firms, in-house legal teams, and individual advocates.
The legal services industry is under pressure to deliver faster, defensible work without burning out senior associates on routine review. Contracts pile up, regulators move quickly, and clients expect citation-backed answers in hours, not weeks. Our legal technology stack — anchored by our LexVio platform — automates the routine while keeping a clear paper trail: AI contract review with Word-exportable redlines, Indian court research with linked citation graphs, portfolio-wide clause benchmarking, and an AES-256 encrypted vault designed for DPDP Act 2023 compliance. The result is a practice that ships more polished work in less time, with every step audit-logged. Where a matter crosses borders, the LexVio Global edition reviews contracts governed by foreign law across 17 jurisdiction profiles in 14 countries.
The AI legal platform that powers this stack — contract review and redlining, Indian court research with citation graphs, and a DPDP-ready matter vault.
AI tooling and matter infrastructure for modern legal practices.
Score, flag, and redline contracts in seconds with tracked changes exportable to Word.
Search Supreme Court, High Courts, NCLT, ITAT, CCI, and CESTAT by clause type with citation graphs.
AES-256 encrypted vault with version control, granular permissions, and audit logs.
Vault-wide search, clause benchmarking, negotiation history, and drift alerts across every matter.
Continuously monitor SEBI, RBI, MCA/ROC, and GST with pre-deadline alerts and change feeds.
No-code multi-step workflows plus Intelligence APIs, SAML SSO, SCIM, and WhatsApp bot access.
A methodology that pairs AI rollout with playbook capture, training, and audit-ready operations.
Map matter types, playbooks, and document volumes across the practice.
Encode your clause library, risk thresholds, and client-facing report styles.
Wire SSO, vaults, calendars, and APIs into your DMS, CRM, and billing tools.
Continuous monitoring, deadline alerts, and quarterly playbook reviews.
The workloads our platforms are engineered to handle — from first deployment through enterprise scale.
Mid-size law firms
AI handles first-pass review and redlining so partners spend their time on negotiation strategy, not commas.
Hours reclaimed per matterIn-house legal teams
Vault-wide search, clause benchmarking, and drift alerts replace shared drives and email threads.
Portfolio-wide visibilityAdvocate practices
Citation-graph backed memos and review reports — branded for the practice, ready in minutes.
Branded, citation-backedLitigation chambers
Searchable judgments across SC, HCs, NCLT, ITAT, CCI, and CESTAT with linked citation graphs.
6 courts/tribunals indexedCommon questions about our legal services solutions.
Yes. Our models are trained on the Indian Contract Act 1872, Companies Act 2013, SEBI regulations, GST Act, and the Supreme Court / High Court judgments corpus — not a translated foreign legal tool.
No. Customer documents are never used to train models without explicit consent. Documents are stored in an AES-256 encrypted vault with TLS 1.3 in transit, RBAC, and full audit logging. The platform is DPDP Act 2023 compliant.
Supreme Court, High Courts, NCLT, ITAT, CCI, and CESTAT — searchable by clause type, jurisdiction, and citation graph.
Yes. The AI generates tracked-change redlines with rationale, exportable as native Word documents that fit straight into your existing negotiation workflow.
Yes. Advocate and Business plans support white-labelled review reports and ATS-friendly outputs, branded for your practice.
Via our Intelligence API and webhooks for data flow, SAML SSO and SCIM for identity, and a browser extension plus WhatsApp bot for in-context review. On-prem deployment is available for regulated workloads.
Yes — through LexVio Global at global.lexvio.ai, a separate edition with its own accounts and USD billing that shares one backend with the India platform. It holds 17 jurisdiction profiles across 14 countries, and goes to sub-national level where contract law is sub-national: Delaware, New York and California in the US, Ontario in Canada, and the DIFC in the UAE. It reads the governing-law clause before deciding which law applies; where a contract names none, the jurisdiction is recorded as unknown and the contract is reviewed as a general commercial contract rather than reassigned to another country’s law on a guess.
Eight of the seventeen jurisdiction profiles are backed by a live adapter that checks the claim against the official government source — legislation.gov.uk, the Irish Statute Book, CELLAR for EU instruments, gesetze-im-internet.de, Australia’s Federal Register of Legislation, Hong Kong e-Legislation via DATA.GOV.HK, Ontario e-Laws, and California’s leginfo. In those a citation can reach a verified verdict; elsewhere the profile is still used but citations are labelled unverified rather than implied confirmed. Sources are used only where the licence and terms permit programmatic access, which is why some jurisdictions deliberately have no adapter.
Book a working session and see how AI contract review, court research, and portfolio intelligence fit into your current workflow.